Results and cases

Assignments where analysis, governance and execution had to hold together.

The cases are described at a high level. The focus is on the type of assignment, Peter’s role, the delivery and the benefits that could be observed.

Reference cases

Examples of assignments where analysis, governance and execution had to be kept together.

The cases are described at an overall level. The focus is on assignment type, method and client value.

Teledermatoscopy: from medical opportunity to workable implementation

Challenge: A clinically valuable idea depended on several organisations, professions and technical systems working as one process. Unclear interfaces between clinical assessment, technology, information flows and operational ownership risked delaying implementation and weakening accountability.

Peter's contribution: brought the parties around a shared problem definition, mapped critical dependencies and connected clinical needs with technology, governance and implementation responsibility.

Delivery: a documented current state, a workable target process, clarified roles and decision points, and a sequenced implementation plan.

Result: leadership received coherent decision material and a clearer route from medical opportunity to controlled operational implementation.

What the case demonstrates: leadership of complex change where no single function owns the whole problem.

Trade union organisation: unclear IT contracts and responsibilities

Challenge: Contract terms, invoices, purchasing responsibility and the services experienced by the organisation did not form a reliable overall picture. This made it difficult to challenge costs, manage supplier performance or determine who was accountable for corrective action.

Peter's contribution: reconciled contracts, delivery evidence, costs and responsibilities, separating verified commitments from assumptions and informal practice.

Delivery: a consolidated contract and service overview, material risk analysis, prioritised decision questions and an action plan for supplier dialogue.

Result: management gained stronger commercial control, clearer requirements and a defensible basis for decisions and continued supplier governance.

What the case demonstrates: connecting legal and commercial conditions with practical accountability and execution.

Larger municipality: crisis preparedness, organisation and execution

Challenge: Formal preparedness requirements and plans existed, but leadership needed confidence that roles, mandates, priorities and escalation paths would also work under pressure across organisational boundaries.

Peter's contribution: tested the current position against operational demands, clarified critical accountability and connected formal requirements with mandates and practical ways of working.

Delivery: a structured gap picture, clearer role allocation, prioritised measures and an actionable sequence for implementation and follow-up.

Result: leadership gained a shared view of the most important gaps and a practical basis for strengthening preparedness, ownership and follow-through.

What the case demonstrates: making a cross-functional and socially critical area governable in practice.

Municipality: property strategy and needs analysis

Challenge: Operational demand, the property portfolio, investment needs and financial constraints were assessed in different parts of the organisation. Without a common evidence base, short-term requests risked driving long-term commitments and costs.

Peter's contribution: integrated premises demand, portfolio data, financial consequences, accountability and feasibility into one leadership-level problem picture.

Delivery: a structured needs analysis, explicit strategic choices, decision criteria and recommendations for continued prioritisation.

Result: decision-makers received a shared basis for comparing needs, challenging assumptions and prioritising property interventions over time.

What the case demonstrates: connecting operational needs with long-term property governance.

Experience

Examples of organisations and environments where experience has been built.

Assignments and experience include private companies, municipalities, regions, public-sector environments and international contexts.

COOPAkademibokhandelnRegion StockholmSwedish Environmental Protection AgencyMoxyIDInera ABSwedish Transport Workers’ UnionMunicipalityLarger municipalityCanon Inc.UAE GovernmentÖssur ABHaninge MunicipalityRegion GotlandRegion Norrbotten

Which decision or execution problem do you need to solve?

Book a free 30-minute orientation call. No preparation needed.

Book a call Call +46 70 533 58 32