Projects and cost
A critical project is losing momentum or becoming more expensive
Identify governance, forecast, decisions and recovery needs before options narrow.
Assess the projectIndependent executive support · Sweden and internationally
When accountability, risk or the way forward is unclear.
Peter Öberg helps boards and leadership teams in businesses and public organisations make and implement difficult decisions through independent analysis, decision-ready evidence and senior execution support.
When is Peter the right support?
When the issue crosses organisational boundaries and must lead to an executable decision.
Choose the situation closest to your reality. Each route helps you define the problem, test the current position and determine a proportionate next step.
Decisions and governance
Leadership lacks decision-ready evidence
Test whether alternatives, consequences, risks, ownership and feasibility are sufficiently clear.
Review the decision materialAccountability and authority
Issues fall between functions or suppliers
Identify where ownership, authority, escalation and follow-up break down.
Assess governanceAI and digitalisation
Technology exists but value or control is missing
Assess leadership accountability, law, security, data, adoption and operational value.
Assess AI maturityChange and execution
The decision is made but everyday practice does not change
Examine whether priorities, capacity, behaviours and follow-up support the change.
Assess change capabilityProperty and energy
Cost, maintenance or premises lack coherent governance
Connect assets, demand, operations, investment and energy to long-term objectives.
Assess property governanceChoose the right route
Different levels of awareness require different next steps.
Not every client needs to begin with an assessment. Choose the route that best reflects what you already know and what you need to achieve.
Understand
We see signs of a problem but need to define it
Use an executive assessment to structure the current position, test assumptions and identify which questions require evidence.
Choose an executive assessmentVerify
We know the problem but need an independent view
Test causes, risks and consequences before leadership selects an intervention or makes a material decision.
Discuss an independent reviewDesign
We need a governance model, decision paper or clear accountability
Develop a practical model for decision rights, roles, follow-up and ways of working that fits the organisation.
See how an assignment worksExecute
We know what must be done but lack capacity or specialist capability
Strengthen the organisation with senior support able to integrate decisions, risk, stakeholders and execution.
Test the need for senior supportServices
Three areas where I create clear value.
Strategy and governance
Support in defining direction, goals, priorities and governance models. I help management and boards move from a broad problem picture to concrete decision material.
Projects and execution
Leadership of projects where many stakeholders, dependencies and decisions need to be held together. The focus is progress, responsibility, risk management and results.
Analysis and organisational development
Reviews, current-state analyses and recommendations that create decision capacity. Especially relevant in reorganisations, cost pressure or unclear governance.
Reference executive assessment
Test whether governance can be evidenced in practice.
The 30-question Governance Assessment is designed for boards, leadership teams, steering groups and accountable executives. It examines decisions, accountability, risk, control and execution—and generates questions for leadership discussion rather than a superficial score.
Reference cases
Examples of assignments where analysis, governance and execution had to be kept together.
The cases are described at an overall level. The focus is on assignment type, method and client value.
Teledermatoscopy: from medical opportunity to workable implementation
Support in structuring a development and implementation assignment where care process, technology, responsibilities, information flows and benefit realisation needed to be coordinated.
Challenge: many stakeholders, high complexity and need for practical execution.
Delivery: current state, target picture, governance, responsibilities and implementation plan.
Value: clearer decision material and better conditions for implementation.
Trade union organisation: unclear IT contracts and responsibilities
Review of IT-related contracts, supplier responsibilities, costs and governance in an organisation where contracts and practical delivery were not sufficiently clear.
Challenge: unclear roles, difficult commitments and risk of responsibility gaps.
Delivery: contract overview, risk analysis, decision questions and recommended actions.
Value: stronger control, clearer requirements and a stronger buyer role.
Larger municipality: crisis preparedness, organisation and execution
Support in converting crisis and preparedness requirements into more concrete organisation, responsibilities, working methods and follow-up.
Challenge: an important area where documents, mandate and practical capability must align.
Delivery: structure, role allocation, priorities and practical next steps.
Value: increased clarity, stronger anchoring and improved execution capability.
Municipality: property strategy and needs analysis
In an assignment linked to a municipality, the work focused on creating an overview of property issues, needs, governance and possible strategic choices.
Challenge: fragmented problem picture, major financial values and need for prioritisation.
Delivery: analysis, structure and recommendations.
Value: better decision-making, clearer priorities and increased feasibility.
Experience
Examples of organisations and environments where experience has been built.
Assignments and experience include private companies, municipalities, regions, public-sector environments and international contexts.
COOPAkademibokhandelnRegion StockholmSwedish Environmental Protection AgencyMoxyIDInera ABSwedish Transport Workers’ UnionMunicipalityLarger municipalityCanon Inc.UAE GovernmentÖssur ABHaninge MunicipalityRegion GotlandRegion Norrbotten
Collaboration
For larger assignments, capacity can be strengthened.
In larger assignments I often collaborate with Björn Ljung, Björn Ljung Consulting AB. This makes it possible to combine senior analysis, governance and execution capacity when the assignment requires broader delivery strength.
Scalable capacityLarger assignments can be staffed without losing seniority or quality.
Complementary perspectiveTwo experienced consultants can combine analysis, governance, stakeholder anchoring and practical execution.
Method
Simple method. High standards. Clear delivery.
1
Define the assignment
We clarify purpose, mandate, expectations, stakeholders and what must be true when the assignment is completed.
2
Create decision material
I gather facts, structure the problem picture and formulate actionable alternatives.
3
Drive results
Execution is followed up with clear responsibility, short decision paths and concrete documentation.
About Peter Öberg
Senior consultant focused on leadership, structure and execution.
Peter Öberg Consulting works with assignments where experience, judgement and the ability to create progress are decisive. I help organisations make difficult issues understandable, create direction and translate decisions into practical action.
My strength lies in combining strategic understanding with operational precision: listening, structuring, prioritising and driving the process forward without losing quality or responsibility.
Contact
Do you have an issue that needs structure, decisions or momentum?
Contact me directly by email or phone for an introductory call.
Email: peter@oebergs.se
Phone: +46 70 533 58 32
Company: Peter Öberg Konsult AB
Company registration number: 559592-1080
F-tax: Innehar F-Skatt
Address: Victor Balcks Väg 127, 122 40 Enskede